Why Does the Romantic Fantasy Continue???


Posted on March 1st, by Elizabeth Debold in Agency/Eros, Blog, Culture, Uncategorized, women. 4 comments

I just read a fascinating interview with Lori Gottlieb, author of Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough. Apparently, just the title–and the suggestion of “settling” in a relationship–has made women go bonkers. Gottlieb says that women are angrily buzzing in the blogosphere about the book, even though many haven’t read it. It goes right up against the romantic fantasy that we women have been spoonfed since Disney’s The Little Mermaid: look, there’s a REAL PRINCE out there who will take one look at you and sweep you off your feet so that you will live in a castle happily ever after. Oh sure, we’re now too old and sophisticated to believe in that stuff…or are we?

Gottlieb mentions a study in which men and women were asked: if you could get 80% of the things that you want most in an intimate life partner, would you be happy? Women tend to say, no, that’s settling for less than the whole enchilada. But men say, 80%–wow, what a find that would be! Sounds like “someday my prince will come” to me. Gottlieb’s message is a wake up call to women. She asks us to take a good look at ourselves–are we the perfect partner that we expect in our mates? (That’s a point made by many “soulmate” coaches: if you aren’t living fully and making the most of yourself and your life, then why would some great guy even be interested in you?) It reminds me also of Arielle Ford’s forthcoming book, Wabi Sabi Love: Finding Perfect Love in Imperfect Relationships.)

But the bigger question to me is: why is it that women are still so spellbound by the romantic fantasy, the desperate desire to be fulfilled and completed in relationship, at the beginning of the 21st century?? For three centuries, since the dawn of the Modern Era, women’s sole means of social mobility was marriage to Mr. Right (read: Mr. Rich). The basic romance narrative is the story of how an attractive and smart young woman of lower birth meets a wealthy and powerful man and, through her character alone, captivates him totally so that he falls hopelessly in love and marries her.  There are variations on this theme, of course, but there are many lessons from it: that a woman’s power and selfhood exists in her capacity to compel a perfect man to love her, that a woman’s security and identity is through her husband, that success for a woman is all about who she marries.

But, yikes, this is, as I said, the 21st century–where women tend to be more educated than men, where the recession hit men harder than women…right? Not to mention that women have equal rights to education, employment, and so forth. We aren’t living in the 19th century when it was believed that if a woman thought (yes, used her mind!) she would cause her womb to atrophy and become infertile. When there were few ways for a woman to earn money on her own in a city, except by being a nanny, house servant, or prostitute.

So, why does the romantic fantasy continue? Why do women feel such a profound lack that they need Mr. Wonderful to make them full people? I’d like to offer a hypothesis: that it’s because we haven’t developed real agency, a real capacity to stake our claim in life and make it all happen. I remember as a young woman, I sought out men to be with who did things–make deals, write books, travel, create businesses–that I didn’t know how to do and was too scared to try on my own. It’s not unique to me: we women often live vicariously through our male partners. (Women’s social status is often based on the position of the man she is married to.) Ironically, perhaps, I think it may be the more educated, middle class, and postmodern among us who struggle the most with creating our own wide path through life and want to have someone else define it for us–someone who is dashing, creative, interesting, courageous and will show us the world that we are dying to see but are reluctant to make our own. And somehow we don’t think we should have to–we think we deserve the prince. There is a strange and distasteful entitlement to this that is so anachronistic.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this capacity for agency–Eros (check out my first blog post on this site!). The very structure of who we are, as Woman, has been created to be Other, the mirror for reflection, to the One who makes it all happen–Man. We see who we are in our relationships, find our self in that perfect idealized relationship. Perhaps that’s why it means so much–we are nothing without it! This insight about “woman as Other” was made by the great Simone de Beauvoir in her classic treatise, The Second Sex. It’s unbelievably important. Woman as Other means that Woman is not a true Creator–and in both a cultural and spiritual sense, that is a disaster.

What do you think? Are we seeking agency through relationship rather than developing it within ourselves? Is that why this romantic fantasy still holds such a huge place in our psyches?





4 responses to “Why Does the Romantic Fantasy Continue???”

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Douglas Turner. Douglas Turner said: Why Does the Romantic Fantasy Continue? http://bit.ly/dulAEL /Book Review-Marry Him:The Case for Settling for Mr.Good Enough by @evolvewomen […]

  2. I enjoyed reading your take on women’s idealizing and romanticizing
    marriage. I agree that the seeds were sewn generations ago when a woman’s status depended upon that of her mate. I don’t think the issue is agency as much as autonomy. Women are quite good at acting to get things done, and some of the best “agents” are women – because they are representing someone else. Women also accomplish things more easily when done with a partner(s) (male or female) or with the support of a group. I believe the problem is acting alone on their own behalf.

    I’ve thought, written, and worked with many women clients on the subject if autonomy. The problem has several sources, some of which are: 1) The biological connection and identification with their mothers, unlike men, as explained in Carol Gilligan’s work with which you are familiar; 2) Women’s low self-esteem, due to the universal belief in women’s inferiority, structurally and culturally reinforced, so that girls and women don’t value themselves without a man, and “winning” the love of a “perfect” man raises their own value, as you describe; 3)Girls continue to be abused, lowering self-esteem and self-confidence; 4)A European sudy found girls desire autonomy as much as boys, but by 16 yrs. old, the boys had achieved much more autonomy than girls, primarily because they were willing to have conflict with their parents. This harkens back to Gilligan’s work, which emphasized that rejection that threatens attachment feels much more threatening to girls/women than men.

    Thank you for your blog.

    Darlene Lancer, JD, M.A., MFT
    http://www.darlenelancer.com

    PS. you might enjoy reading my article on “The healing Power of Eros,” in Somatics. It’s viewable on the web, if you google it and my name.

  3. Scent Magic says:

    Your post resonated – I can clearly recall that aha moment when I realized in my 20’s I was dating men who pursued ambitions in life I really wanted to try – but had been too afraid. That was a huge turning point, because up until then I couldn’t figure out why eventually the relationship would falter. Happily married now for 13 years, I still feel having a supportive partner makes it easier to step outside my comfort zone and try new things – but the thought of “settling” will always make my skin crawl. Life’s too short!

    laura

  4. Caelyn says:

    Snudos great to me BWTHDIK

Leave a Reply



MOST RECENT POSTS

From pop culture to politics, sexuality to spirituality, whatever and what-have-you, I'm commenting on it, hashing out my own thinking on the upward trends and troubles of our times. Please join in with a comment!

Beyond Polarity: A New Encounter between Women and Men

The day after my very first appearance on New York cable TV—it was the 80s, so cable was new and small—I got...

What Makes a Truly Global Education?

In the middle of nothing—that is, nothing but sand stretching in every direction—there is a peculiar oasis. It has huge palm trees with thick...

Time to Be Human: Gender Liberation and the Creation of a New Culture

The United Nations declared 1976-1985 the Decade of Women, which created an international consensus on the importance of women’s political and social equality. The...